Skip Navigation

Food Handling Controls (Show all)

If potentially hazardous food is not displayed under temperature control, is there a documented alternate method of compliance?

Guidance

Standard 3.2.2 cl 25 of the Code allows a food business to use alternative methods of compliance to the temperature control processes outlined in Appendix A. The business must demonstrate that its alternative method of compliance does not compromise food safety.

Below are some ways to demonstrate alternative compliance.

  1. Comply with a food safety program:
    • as per Standard 3.2.1; or
    • for oyster (and other bivalves) harvesters, processors and distributors, a food safety program as per Standard 4.2.1 cl 16(2);
  2. for businesses that provide food to vulnerable populations such as hospital patients, aged care residents and children in child care centres, a food safety program in accordance with Standard 3.3.1.

  3. Comply with a process that, according to documented sound scientific evidence, will not adversely affect the microbiological safety of the food.
  4. Comply with a process set out in written guidelines, based on sound scientific evidence that is recognised by the relevant food industry.
Non-complianceMinor
  • N/A
Major
  • A standard method is in place for the display of food using 2/4 hour rule however this method is not documented in a written procedure.
  • The food business is using an alternate method of compliance but cannot demonstrate their method maintains food safety.
Critical
  • The food business displays food without temperature control or any alternate method of compliance (use of time periods) and the business is unable to demonstrate that the displayed food is safe.